14楼和17楼的兄弟看错了吧，那是有关此网站的调查方式介绍。有关排名信息的资料来自于
1。Our own Webometrics Ranking of World Universities这是他们自己调查的，也就是网页点击律。
2。Essential Science Indicators is a powerful database elaborated by The Thomson Corporation that provides number of papers and citations received by those papers for a large number of institutions worldwide 此机构对于世界高等教育机构的（自然科学）科研能力调查
3Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com) still in a beta phase is providing access to a large (and increasing) number of databases interlinked of bibliographic and webliographic records of scientific papers。google 上各大学展示的科学文献以及资料。
4The Academic Ranking of World Universities, updated in 2005 (http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm) elaborated by the Institute of Higher Education of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University.上海交通大学的垃圾排名（及其LJ）。此排名连咱们自己国家大学都不相信。哎～～～可怜的北大。
5The Times Higher World University Rankings 2005 (http://www.thes.co.uk/worldrankings/) consists of only 200 institutions. The rank was also considered as an impact measurement.
时代周刊的05年大学排名。
以上是此排名的信心自量来元和基于的标准。所以他们绝对不是瞎排的，而是纯量化，所以他们自己也说排名是没有意义的。个人估计RSM可能是偏于文科的大学，不好量化，所有有些失真。这也就是量化的弊端了。^_^。
登录
