GGD会员知识分享的民意测验,加威望

amy57j

哗，期待中。。。。。

who

不知道晚了没有， 刚刚还是答完了调查问卷。

CHAN

Around 740members visited our survey questionnaires and 275members finally filled in the survey. 236 members filled in the Chinese survey while 39 members filled in the English survey. The response rate is around 37.2% (275/740).

In the survey, we deliberately inserted a testing question, i.e. Sharing my knowledge will NOT make me happy, which in fact, is the negative expression of the real question POE2: Sharing my knowledge will make me happy. Any response that was not consistent in these two questions was excluded. The answer to the testing question would not be included in the data analysis. After excluding 62surveys with inconsistent answers between the test and real questions, and recognizing case 174 as outlier, we finally got 212 valid responses.

[ 本帖最后由 CHAN 于 2010-7-24 13:31 编辑 ]

CHAN

Table 1, described the sample demographics. 66% respondents are female while 34% are male. Most respondents are between ages from 20 to 35years (91%) and have bachelor degree or above (88.2%). This is basically conforming to estimated gender, age and education distributions of members in gogodutch. 85.4% respondents reported that they have been in the Netherlands for at least 6months with 39.2% respondents said to be over 3years. 85.8% respondents have had the membership of gogodutch for more than 6months. Among them, 33.2% replied to have the membership over 3years. All this guarantees that the respondents have got enough time to know the Netherlands and to have the ability to share relevant knowledge with other members. Overall the respondents can represent most members in gogodutch.

Table 1: Sample Demographics (the number of valid cases are 212)

Demographics	Respondents
Gender: Male Female	34% (72 / 212) 66% (140 / 212)
Age: Below 20: 20 to 35: 35 to 45: Above 45:	4.7% (10 / 212) 91% (193 / 212) 4.2% (9 / 212) 0% (0)
Education: Bachelor: Master: PHD: Others:	42% (89 / 212) 37.7% (80 / 212) 8.5% (18 / 212) 11.8% (25 / 212)
Years in the Netherlands of the members: Less than 3months 3months to 6months 6months to 1year 1year to 2years 2years to 3years Over 3years Not in the NL or missing data	1.9% (4 / 212) 5.2% (11 / 212) 17.9% (38 / 212) 16.5% (35 / 212) 11.8% (25 / 212) 39.2% (83 / 212) 7.5% (16 / 212)
Years of gogodutch membership: Not registered Less than 3months 3months to 6months 6months to 1year 1year to 2years 2years to 3years Over 3years missing data	0.5% (1 / 212) 7.6% (16 / 212) 4.3% (10 / 212) 15.2% (31 / 212) 19.4% (41 / 212) 18% (38 / 212) 33.2% (71 / 212) 1.8% (4 / 212)

CHAN

论文写好了,可以发给你看哈~~ 数据分析结果不是很好。

CHAN

  Hypotheses on personal outcome EXPECTATIONs （POE)

H1a: Personal outcome expectations are positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H1b: Personal outcome expectations are positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H1c: Personal outcome expectations are positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

Hypotheses on community related outcome EXPECTATIONs  (COE)

H2a: Community-related expectations are positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H2b: Community-related expectations are positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H2c: Community-related expectations are positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;


Hypotheses on STRUCTURAL DIMENSION-Social interaction ties (SI)


H3 a: Social interaction ties are positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H3 b: Social interaction ties are positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H3 c: Social interaction ties are positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

Hypotheses on Relational dimension - Trust (TR)
H4a: Trust is positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H4b: Trust is positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H4c: Trust is positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

Hypotheses on Relational dimension – norm of reciprocity (NR)
H5 a: Norm of reciprocity is positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H5 b: Norm of reciprocity is positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H5 c: Norm of reciprocity is positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

Hypotheses on Relational dimension – identification (ID)

H6a: Identification is positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H6b: Identification is positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H6c: Identification is positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

Hypotheses on cognitive dimension - Shared vision (SV)

H7a: Shared vision is positively associated with the quantity of knowledge sharing;
H7b: Shared vision is positively associated with the quality of tacit knowledge sharing;
H7c: Shared vision is positively associated with the quality of explicit knowledge sharing;

CHAN

Table 2: Summary of SEM analysis results

Constructs	Standardized regression weight	P value	Hypothesis
KQS <--- POE	-0.630*	0.024	H1a rejected
KQB <--- POE	0.065	0.863	H1b rejected
KQA <--- POE	0.225	0.511	H1c rejected
KQS <--- COE	0.476*	0.027	H2a supported
KQB <--- COE	-0.359	0.231	H2b rejected
KQA <--- COE	-0.368	0.171	H2c rejected
KQS <--- SI	0.552**	0.001	H3a supported
KQB <--- SI	0.068	0.729	H3b rejected
KQA <--- SI	0.027	0.877	H3c rejected
KQS <--- TR	0.097	0.401	H4a rejected
KQB <--- TR	0.248	0.206	H4a rejected
KQA <--- TR	0.357*	0.045	H4c supported
KQS <--- NR	0.008	0.976	H5a rejected
KQB <--- NR	1.852***	0.000	H5b supported
KQA <--- NR	1.582***	0.000	H5c supported
KQS <--- ID	0.146	0.625	H6a rejected
KQB <--- ID	-1.090*	0.029	H6b rejected
KQA <--- ID	-1.191*	0.010	H6c rejected
KQS <--- SV	-0.256	0.163	H7a rejected
KQB <--- SV	0.048	0.874	H7b rejected
KQA <--- SV	0.209	0.437	H7c rejected

Remark: *P<0.05; ** P<0.01; ***P<0.001

KQS: Quantity of knowledge sharing
KQA: Quality of explicit knowledge sharing
KQB: Quality of tacit knowledge sharing
POE: Personal outcome expectations
COE: Community related outcome expectations
SI: Social interaction ties
TR: Trust
NR: Norm of reciprocity
SV: Shared vision
ID: Identification

[ 本帖最后由 CHAN 于 2010-7-24 13:51 编辑 ]

CHAN

会继续更新~~

amy57j

原帖由 CHAN 于 2010-7-24 13:37 发表
论文写好了,可以发给你看哈~~ 数据分析结果不是很好。

辛苦啦。也要恭喜下，就快毕业了吧。

好的，如果方便的话，发给我看看吧。谢谢mm啊。我pm你我的邮件地址。